The topology of the p-adic numbers 2

Our goal for this post is to review topology and prove that Zp is a topological group/ring. In order to do so, we prove properties of topological groups, inverse limits, and neighborhoods.

This is my attempt to understand the following lines from Serre's A Course in Arithmetic:

"The ideals pnZp form a basis of neighborhoods of 0; since xpnZp is equivalent to vp(x)n, the topology on Zp is defined by the distance d(x,y)=evp(xy). Since Zp is compact, it is complete. Finally, if x=(xn) is an element of Zp, and if ynZ is such that ynxn (mod, then \lim y_n = x , which proves that \mathbb{Z} is dense in \mathbb{Z}_p ."  

Definition: A filter \mathcal{F} on a set S is a subset of \mathcal{P}(S) , the power group of S satisfying the following properties,
1) If A, B \in \mathcal{F} , then A \cap B \in \mathcal{F} .
2) If A \in \mathcal{F} and A \subset B \in \mathcal{P}(S) , then B \in \mathcal{F} .

If the filter contains \varnothing , then all subsets of S is inside the filter. Hence, we will assume that the filter does not contain the empty set. Such filter is called a proper filter.

We immediately give an example of a filter. Let \tau be a topology on G . Let g \in G , then consider the set of all neighborhoods of x denoted \mathcal{V}(g) .
\mathcal{V}(g) := \{ V \in \mathcal{P}(S) ~|~ \exists~U \in \tau, g \in U \subset V \}
We can easily check the two properties.
1) Let V_1, V_2 \in \mathcal{V}(g) , then there exist U_1 and U_2 such that g \in U_i \subset V_i for i=1,2 . Then clearly, g \in U_1 \cap U_2 \subset V_1 \cap V_2 with U_1 \cap U_2 \in \tau .
2) If V_1 \subset V_2 with V_1 \in \mathcal{V}(g) , then there exists U \in \tau such that g \in U \subset V_1 \subset V_2 . This immediately shows that V_2 \in \mathcal{V}(g) .

Because \varnothing does not contain an element, it cannot be a neighborhood of g . This shows that \mathcal{V}(g) is a proper filter for all g \in G .

Definition: A filter base \mathcal{B} is a subset of \mathcal{P}(S) satisfying
1) \mathcal{B} is nonempty, and if for any A,B \in \mathcal{B} there exists C \in \mathcal{B} such that C \subset A \cap B .
2) \varnothing \notin \mathcal{B}

We define the filter \mathcal{F} generated by a filter base \mathcal{B} to be the smallest filter containing \mathcal{B} . In other word,
\mathcal{F} = \bigcap_{\substack{\mathcal{F}' ~\text{filter} \\ \mathcal{B} \subset \mathcal{F}'}} \mathcal{F}'
For a filter \mathcal{F} , any A, B \in \mathcal{F} \Rightarrow A \cap B \subset A \cap B with A \cap B \in \mathcal{F} . Hence, every proper filter is a filter base. This implies that a filter can be viewed as some sort of completion of a filter base.

Suppose we have \mathcal{B}(g) \subset \mathcal{V}(g) with the following property: V \in \mathcal{V}(g) if and only if there exists B \in \mathcal{B}(g) such that B \subset V . We call such \mathcal{B}(g) a neighborhood base of g .

Let A, B \in \mathcal{B}(g) , then A and B are neighborhoods of g by themselves, as set contains itself. A \cap B is thus a neighborhood, and there exists an C \in \mathcal{B}(g) such that C \subset A \cap B by definition. Also, as \varnothing is not a neighborhood of any element, \varnothing \notin \mathcal{B}(g) . This shows that the neighborhood base is a filter base.

Let filter \mathcal{F} contain \mathcal{B}(g) . Let V \in \mathcal{V}(g) , then by definition, B \subset V by some B \in \mathcal{B}(g) . By the definition of a filter, V \in \mathcal{F} . It is clear now that \mathcal{B}(g) generates the neighborhood filter of g . There are many literature which calls a neighborhood base as a fundamental system of neighborhoods.

Next topological property that we will review is continuity. Many (including myself) is familiar with the following definition. Let f : X \rightarrow Y be a map between topological spaces X and Y . Then f is called continuous if for all open set V  \subset Y , the inverse image f^{-1}(V) \subset X is open. However, there exists a neighborhood definition which resembles the \varepsilon-\delta definition.

Definition: A map f: X \rightarrow Y between topological spaces is said to be continuous at a point x \in X if for a neighborhood W of f(x) , there exists V a neighborhood of x such that f(V) \subset W .

Proposition: A map f: X \rightarrow Y between topological spaces is continuous if and only if f is continuous at every point x in X .

Proof)
Let f be continuous. Fix x \in X and let W be a neighborhood of f(x) . Then there exists a open set W' containing f(x) with W' \subset W . This implies that x \in f^{-1}(W') with f^{-1}(W') open by continuity.   f^{-1}(W) becomes the neighborhood of x with f(f^{-1}(W')) \subset W' \subset W .

Conversely, let f be continuous at every point in X . Now consider an open set W \subset Y . If f^{-1}(W) is empty, then there is nothing to prove. If f^{-1}(W) is not empty, then for every x \in f^{-1}(W) , f(x) \in W \Rightarrow there exist V_x neighborhood of x such that f(V_x) \subset W . For each V_x , there exists U_x open set containing x such that U_x \subset V_x . As V_x \subset f^{-1}(W) , U_x \subset f^{-1}(W) . Clearly the union of all U_x equals f^{-1}(W) , thus open.

Now we are ready to learn about topological groups.

Definition: A topological group G is a group endowed with a topology \tau such that the multiplication G \times G \rightarrow G defined by (g,h) \mapsto gh and the inverse G \rightarrow G defined by g \mapsto g^{-1} is continuous when G \times G is endowed with the product topology.

The two inclusions maps i_1 : G \rightarrow G \times G and i_2: G \rightarrow G \times G defined by i_1(g) = (g,h) and i_2(g) = (e, h) for some h \in G are continuous as i_j^{-1}(U_1 \times U_2) = U_j for j=1,2 with U_j open.

Furthermore, if f: X \rightarrow X' and g: Y \rightarrow Y' , then we can define the f \times g : X \times Y \rightarrow X' \times Y' by (f \times g)(x,y) = (f(x), g(y)) . Then observing that (f \times g)^{-1}(U_1 \times U_2) = f^{-1}(U_1) \times g^{-1}(U_2) , we see that the (cartesian) product of continuous functions is continuous.

The composition
G \times G \rightarrow G \times G \rightarrow G
defined by
(g,h) \mapsto (g, h^{-1}) \mapsto gh^{-1}
is continuous.

Conversely, suppose the above composition is continuous in some group G endowed with some topology. Then
G \rightarrow G \times G \rightarrow G
defined by g \mapsto (e,g) \mapsto g^{-1} is continuous. Also,
G \times G \rightarrow G \times G \rightarrow G
defined by (g,h) \mapsto (g, h^{-1}) \mapsto g(h^{-1})^{-1} = gh is contiuous. Instead of saying that addition and inverse map are continuous, we could simply prove that (g,h) \mapsto gh^{-1} is continuous to show that a group is a topological group.

Then continuity of the injections implies that the left translation and right translation are continuous because for a fixed h \in G, g \mapsto (g,h) \mapsto gh is continuous. Composition of both left and right translation gives an internal automorphism which is continuous.

The continuity of addition, inverse, and the internal automorphism can be translated into the following properties, let e \in G
1) For all U \in \mathcal{V}(e) , there exists V \in \mathcal{V}(e) such that VV \subset U ,
2) For all U \in \mathcal{V}(e) , there exists V \in \mathcal{V}(e) such that V^{-1} \subset U .
3) For all U \in \mathcal{V}(e), g \in G , there exists V \in \mathcal{V}(e) such that gVg^{-1} \subset U .

In fact, the above property characterizes the neighborhood filter. In other words, let \mathcal{V} be a filter on G satisfying 1), 2), 3).

We first show that for all U \in \mathcal{V}, e \in U . Take W \in \mathcal{V} such that WW \subset U . There exists V \in \mathcal{V} such that V^{-1} \subset W . We have that V' = V \cap W \in \mathcal{V} . Also, V'^{-1} \subset V^{-1} , hence V'^{-1} \subset W . We conclude by e \in V'(V')^{-1} \subset WW \subset U .

Next we will define a topology such that \mathcal{V} is the collection of all neighborhoods of e , and that the such topology makes G into a topolgocial group. Consider the following,
\tau = \{ U \subset G ~|~ \forall~g \in U, \exists~U_g \in \mathcal{V} \text{ such that } gU_g \subset U \}
The fact that \cup gU_i = g ( \cup U_i ) and \cap g( U_i) = g (\cap U_i ) implies that \tau is a topology. In this topology, we let \mathcal{V}(g) be the collection of all neighborhoods of g \in G . Also, we denote g\mathcal{V} = \{ gV ~|~ V \in \mathcal{V} .

First we show that \mathcal{V}(g) \subset g\mathcal{V} . Let V \in \mathcal{V}(g) , then there exists U \in  \tau such that g \in U \subset V . By the construction of \tau , there exists U_g  \in \mathcal{V} such that gU_g \subset U \subset V . Then this implies that U_g \subset g^{-1}V . Because U_g \in \mathcal{V} and \mathcal{V} is a filter, g^{-1}V \in \mathcal{V} \Rightarrow V \in g\mathcal{V} .

We prove the converse. Let V \in \mathcal{V} . We define
U = \{ h \in gV ~|~ \exists~W \in \mathcal{V} \text{ such that } hW \subset gV \}
Clearly, gV \subset gV \Rightarrow g \in U and U is a subset of gV . So it suffices to show that U \in \tau . Let x \in U , then by definition, there exists W such that xW \subset gV . Let O \in \mathcal{V} such that OO \subset W \Rightarrow xOO \subset xW \subset gV . Because O contains the identity, xO \subset gV . Also, as xoO \subset gV for all o \in O , we see that xO \subset U by the definition of U . This O is exactly the U_g needed for U to be open.

Last thing we need to show is the continuity of the map f defined by (x,y) \mapsto xy^{-1} . Fix x,y \in G . Let U \in \mathcal{V} . By 3), there exists W \in \mathcal{V} such that yWy^{-1} \subset U  \Rightarrow Wy^{-1} \subset y^{-1}U . We can choose V' \in \mathcal{V} such that V' V' \subset W , and similar to what we did above, there exists V \in \mathcal{V} such that V \subset V', V^{-1} \subset V' . To conclude,   VV^{-1} \subset V'V' \subset W . Let O = xV \times yV , then it is clearly open as xV, yV are open. Furthermore, f(O)  = xVV^{-1}y^{-1} \subset xWy^{-1} \subset xy^{-1}U .

In other words, fix a point (x,y) , then for any neighborhood of xy^{-1} which will have the form xy^{-1}U , there exists a neighborhood of (x,y) which is xV \times yV such that f(xV \times yV) \subset xy^{-1}U , thus continuous.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max-Spec vs Spec

함수와 무한대2