Yoshida - Non-abelian Lubin-Tate 5




Some remarks.

  • Let f:XY be a morphism of (integral) schemes. Then we say that f is a Galois covering if K(X)/K(Y) is a Galois extension. A0 is clearly a domain and Am is a regular local ring, then by Matsumura, Theorem 14.3, we know that Am is a domain. Therefore Spec AmSpec A0 is a morphism of integral schemes.
    • According to the post in mathSE, Y becomes a quotient of X by the group of deck transformations of f which turns out to be the Galois group. 
    • According to the Wiki article, discrete valuation ring is a regular ring with dimension 1. The converse is also true. Therefore A0:=W[[X1,,Xn1]] is a regular ring with dimension n.
  • Review on representable functor
    • A functor F:C(Set) is called representable if there exists AC such that F is naturally isomorphic to Hom(A,) (or Hom(,A) for contravariant functor).
    • A pair (A,Φ) is called a representation if Φ is the natural isomorphism between Hom(A,) and F.
    • By Yoneda, we know that Φ corresponds to an element uF(A).
    • Such element corresponds one-to-one with representation if (A,u) is a universal element, i.e. for every pair (B,v) with vF(B), there exists a unique morphism f:AB such that F(f)(u)=v.
  • Consider the level zero deformation functor F0:C(Set). This is represented by A0:=W[[X1,,Xn]] with some natural transformation. The corresponding element would in F(A) would be the universal deformation.
    • We must ask how morphisms interact. Given f:AB, the deformation Σ over B becomes a deformation of A by applying f, i.e. if f=idA, then F(idA)=idF(A) as we all know (as we need to prove that F is actually a functor).
    • Let (A,Φ) and (A,Φ) be representations, i.e. both (A,u) and (A,v) be universal objects with u:=ΦA(idA) and v:=ΦA(idA). Let f:AA and g:AA with F(f)(u)=v and F(g)(v)=u. By the universal property, f and g are inverses of each other, i.e. f is an automorphism.
    • The problem boils down to f:AA automorphism, then ΣΣA,fA.
    • If my understanding is correct, then given F an formal OK-module over A,
      F(X,Y)=aijXiYj
      and if G=FAB with the A-algebra structure morphism f:AB
      G(X,Y)=f(aij)XiYjB[[X,Y]]
    • Suppose f is an isomorphism with g as its inverse. Can you construct a morphism H and H1 such that H:FG is an isomorphism of formal groups?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max-Spec vs Spec

함수와 무한대2