Yoshida - Non-abelian Lubin-Tate 5
Some remarks.
- Let f:X→Y be a morphism of (integral) schemes. Then we say that f is a Galois covering if K(X)/K(Y) is a Galois extension. A0 is clearly a domain and Am is a regular local ring, then by Matsumura, Theorem 14.3, we know that Am is a domain. Therefore Spec Am→Spec A0 is a morphism of integral schemes.
- According to the post in mathSE, Y becomes a quotient of X by the group of deck transformations of f which turns out to be the Galois group.
- According to the Wiki article, discrete valuation ring is a regular ring with dimension 1. The converse is also true. Therefore A0:=W[[X1,…,Xn−1]] is a regular ring with dimension n.
- Review on representable functor
- A functor F:C→(Set) is called representable if there exists A∈C such that F is naturally isomorphic to Hom(A,−) (or Hom(−,A) for contravariant functor).
- A pair (A,Φ) is called a representation if Φ is the natural isomorphism between Hom(A,−) and F.
- By Yoneda, we know that Φ corresponds to an element u∈F(A).
- Such element corresponds one-to-one with representation if (A,u) is a universal element, i.e. for every pair (B,v) with v∈F(B), there exists a unique morphism f:A→B such that F(f)(u)=v.
- Consider the level zero deformation functor F0:C→(Set). This is represented by A0:=W[[X1,…,Xn]] with some natural transformation. The corresponding element would in F(A) would be the universal deformation.
- We must ask how morphisms interact. Given f:A→B, the deformation Σ over B becomes a deformation of A by applying f, i.e. if f=idA, then F(idA)=idF(A) as we all know (as we need to prove that F is actually a functor).
- Let (A,Φ) and (A,Φ′) be representations, i.e. both (A,u) and (A,v) be universal objects with u:=ΦA(idA) and v:=Φ′A(idA). Let f:A→A and g:A→A with F(f)(u)=v and F(g)(v)=u. By the universal property, f and g are inverses of each other, i.e. f is an automorphism.
- The problem boils down to f:A→A automorphism, then Σ≅Σ⊗A,fA.
- If my understanding is correct, then given F an formal OK-module over A,
F(X,Y)=∑aijXiYj
and if G=F⊗AB with the A-algebra structure morphism f:A→B
G(X,Y)=∑f(aij)XiYj∈B[[X,Y]] - Suppose f is an isomorphism with g as its inverse. Can you construct a morphism H and H−1 such that H:F→G is an isomorphism of formal groups?
Comments
Post a Comment