The topology of the p-adic numbers 3
Let G be a topological space and let H be a subspace of G endowed with the subspace topology. Then HΓH endowed with the product topology is same as the subspace topology of HΓHβGΓG with GΓG endowed with the product topology due to:
(U1β©H)Γ(U2β©H)=(U1ΓU2)β©(HΓH)
Let G be a topological group with a subgroup H. We would like to show that H endowed with the subspace topology is also a topological group. Let pG denote the product map. in G and pH denote the product map in H. We want to show that pH is continuous. Let U be an open set in H, then U=UGβ©H for some open set UG in G.
pβ1H(U)={(h1,h2)βHΓH | h1h2βU}={(g1,g2)βGΓG | g1g2βUG}β©HΓH=pβ1G(UG)β©HΓH
If vG and vH denote the inverse map of G and H respectively. Suppose vG is continuous. And suppose UβH be an open set in H. Then U=UGβ©H with UG open in G.
vβ1H(U)={hβH | hβ1βU}={gβG | gβ1βUG}β©H=vβ1G(UG)β©H
This two fact shows that subgroup with subspace topology will induce a topological group. Next step is to show that (Cartesian) product of topological groups will induce a topological group.
Proposition: Let {Gi} be a collection of topological groups. Then G=βGi is a topological group with the product topology.
Proof)
Let VG be the collection of neighborhood of eG. By the previous post, we have seen that all other neighborhood filters are determined by VG simply by translation. Thus, it suffices to show that VG satisfies the three properties (which implies the continuity of multiplication, inverse, and the inner automorphism.) However, this is simple once we see that
βAiβ βBi=βAiBi(βAi)β1=βAβ1ig(βAi)gβ1=β(gAigβ1)
Because each component of βUiβVG is a neighborhood in Gi, there exists Vi satisfying the desired properties. Then βVi where almost of Vi=Gi shows that βViβVG and βViβViββUi, and similarly for all other properties.
All these results can be extended to topological rings.
Given Z/pnZ with the discrete topology, the modular rings are all topological ring. Thus its infinite product is also a topological ring. Zp is a subgroup of the infinite product with induced topology, which we have proved to be a topological ring.
Now I can say in confidence that
Proposition: Zp is a topological ring.
What is nice about topological groups is that if V(e) is the collection of neighborhoods of e, the identity element, then for all gβG, the collection of neighborhoods of g is V(g)=gV(e). Let VβV(g), then there exists an open set U containing g and that is contained in V. Clearly, eβgβ1Uβgβ1V. Because the translation map is continuous in a topological group, gβ1U is open, thus gβ1VβV(e). In other words, VβgV(e). Conversely, if eβUβV, then gβgUβgV implies that gV(e)βV(g). We conclude that collection of neighborhoods of g for all gβG is determined by V(e). If we go further, this means that the basis of neighborhoods of e is sufficient to determine the topology of a topological group.
In a metric space, it is not hard to see that the open disc around a point is a basis of neighborhoods of a given point. First, we observe that pnZp form a basis of neighborhoods of 0. Any open set U in Zp is of the form
U=(U1Γβ―ΓUmΓβn>mZ/pnZ)
with 0βUi. Consider xβpmZp, then for x=(xn),xn=0 for nβ€m. Then clearly, xβUβpmZpβU. If B(e)={pnZp, then for all VβV(e) ,there exists an open set UβVβpmZpβUβV for some m shows that B(e) is a basis.
For those who aren't familiar with the term basis, it is the filter base of the neighborhood filter. By the following equivalence
xβpmZpβvp(x)β₯nβvp(x)β€eβm
We see that pmZp=BΞ΅(e) where BΞ΅(e) denotes the open disc around e with radius Ξ΅. The discreteness of vp shows that pmZp is the only possible open discs around e, thus coincides with the metric basis. We have thus shown that topology induced by the inverse limit is equivalent to the metric topology induced by the metric ΞΌ(x,y)=eβvp(xβy).
By basic topology, a compact metric space is complete.
Finally, consider xβZp, then there always exists ynβZ such that ynβ‘xn (mod pn) Then because ynβxn is divisible by pn, pn|(ynβxn)βΞΌ(ynβxn)β€eβn. Then as nββ, you see that the limit goes to 0. This implies that x is a limit point of Z which shows denseness.
I have thus understood what Serre's four lines that I mentioned in my second post (of the topology of the p-adic numbers) means. (Sort of)
(U1β©H)Γ(U2β©H)=(U1ΓU2)β©(HΓH)
Let G be a topological group with a subgroup H. We would like to show that H endowed with the subspace topology is also a topological group. Let pG denote the product map. in G and pH denote the product map in H. We want to show that pH is continuous. Let U be an open set in H, then U=UGβ©H for some open set UG in G.
pβ1H(U)={(h1,h2)βHΓH | h1h2βU}={(g1,g2)βGΓG | g1g2βUG}β©HΓH=pβ1G(UG)β©HΓH
If vG and vH denote the inverse map of G and H respectively. Suppose vG is continuous. And suppose UβH be an open set in H. Then U=UGβ©H with UG open in G.
vβ1H(U)={hβH | hβ1βU}={gβG | gβ1βUG}β©H=vβ1G(UG)β©H
This two fact shows that subgroup with subspace topology will induce a topological group. Next step is to show that (Cartesian) product of topological groups will induce a topological group.
Proposition: Let {Gi} be a collection of topological groups. Then G=βGi is a topological group with the product topology.
Proof)
Let VG be the collection of neighborhood of eG. By the previous post, we have seen that all other neighborhood filters are determined by VG simply by translation. Thus, it suffices to show that VG satisfies the three properties (which implies the continuity of multiplication, inverse, and the inner automorphism.) However, this is simple once we see that
βAiβ βBi=βAiBi(βAi)β1=βAβ1ig(βAi)gβ1=β(gAigβ1)
Because each component of βUiβVG is a neighborhood in Gi, there exists Vi satisfying the desired properties. Then βVi where almost of Vi=Gi shows that βViβVG and βViβViββUi, and similarly for all other properties.
All these results can be extended to topological rings.
Given Z/pnZ with the discrete topology, the modular rings are all topological ring. Thus its infinite product is also a topological ring. Zp is a subgroup of the infinite product with induced topology, which we have proved to be a topological ring.
Now I can say in confidence that
Proposition: Zp is a topological ring.
What is nice about topological groups is that if V(e) is the collection of neighborhoods of e, the identity element, then for all gβG, the collection of neighborhoods of g is V(g)=gV(e). Let VβV(g), then there exists an open set U containing g and that is contained in V. Clearly, eβgβ1Uβgβ1V. Because the translation map is continuous in a topological group, gβ1U is open, thus gβ1VβV(e). In other words, VβgV(e). Conversely, if eβUβV, then gβgUβgV implies that gV(e)βV(g). We conclude that collection of neighborhoods of g for all gβG is determined by V(e). If we go further, this means that the basis of neighborhoods of e is sufficient to determine the topology of a topological group.
In a metric space, it is not hard to see that the open disc around a point is a basis of neighborhoods of a given point. First, we observe that pnZp form a basis of neighborhoods of 0. Any open set U in Zp is of the form
U=(U1Γβ―ΓUmΓβn>mZ/pnZ)
with 0βUi. Consider xβpmZp, then for x=(xn),xn=0 for nβ€m. Then clearly, xβUβpmZpβU. If B(e)={pnZp, then for all VβV(e) ,there exists an open set UβVβpmZpβUβV for some m shows that B(e) is a basis.
For those who aren't familiar with the term basis, it is the filter base of the neighborhood filter. By the following equivalence
xβpmZpβvp(x)β₯nβvp(x)β€eβm
We see that pmZp=BΞ΅(e) where BΞ΅(e) denotes the open disc around e with radius Ξ΅. The discreteness of vp shows that pmZp is the only possible open discs around e, thus coincides with the metric basis. We have thus shown that topology induced by the inverse limit is equivalent to the metric topology induced by the metric ΞΌ(x,y)=eβvp(xβy).
By basic topology, a compact metric space is complete.
Finally, consider xβZp, then there always exists ynβZ such that ynβ‘xn (mod pn) Then because ynβxn is divisible by pn, pn|(ynβxn)βΞΌ(ynβxn)β€eβn. Then as nββ, you see that the limit goes to 0. This implies that x is a limit point of Z which shows denseness.
I have thus understood what Serre's four lines that I mentioned in my second post (of the topology of the p-adic numbers) means. (Sort of)
Comments
Post a Comment