The topology of the p-adic numbers 3

Let G be a topological space and let H be a subspace of G endowed with the subspace topology. Then H×H endowed with the product topology is same as the subspace topology of H×HG×G with G×G endowed with the product topology due to:
(U1H)×(U2H)=(U1×U2)(H×H)
Let G be a topological group with a subgroup H. We would like to show that H endowed with the subspace topology is also a topological group. Let pG denote the product map. in G and pH denote the product map in H. We want to show that pH is continuous. Let U be an open set in H, then U=UGH for some open set UG in G.
p1H(U)={(h1,h2)H×H | h1h2U}={(g1,g2)G×G | g1g2UG}H×H=p1G(UG)H×H
If vG  and vH denote the inverse map of G and H respectively.  Suppose vG is continuous. And suppose UH be an open set in H. Then U=UGH with UG open in G.
v1H(U)={hH | h1U}={gG | g1UG}H=v1G(UG)H
This two fact shows that subgroup with subspace topology will induce a topological group. Next step is to show that (Cartesian) product of topological groups will induce a topological group.

Proposition: Let {Gi} be a collection of topological groups. Then G=Gi is a topological group with the product topology.

Proof)
Let VG be the collection of neighborhood of eG. By the previous post, we have seen that all other neighborhood filters are determined by VG simply by translation. Thus, it suffices to show that VG satisfies the three properties (which implies the continuity of multiplication, inverse, and the inner automorphism.) However, this is simple once we see that
AiBi=AiBi(Ai)1=A1ig(Ai)g1=(gAig1)
Because each component of UiVG is a neighborhood in Gi, there exists Vi satisfying the desired properties. Then Vi where almost of Vi=Gi shows that ViVG and ViViUi, and similarly for all other properties.

All these results can be extended to topological rings.

Given Z/pnZ with the discrete topology, the modular rings are all topological ring. Thus its infinite product is also a topological ring. Zp is a subgroup of the infinite product with induced topology, which we have proved to be a topological ring.

Now I can say in confidence that

Proposition: Zp is a topological ring.

What is nice about topological groups is that if V(e) is the collection of neighborhoods of e, the identity element, then for all gG, the collection of neighborhoods of g is V(g)=gV(e). Let VV(g), then there exists an open set U containing g and that is contained in V. Clearly, eg1Ug1V. Because the translation map is continuous in a topological group, g1U is open, thus g1VV(e). In other words, VgV(e). Conversely, if eUV, then ggUgV implies that gV(e)V(g). We conclude that collection of neighborhoods of g for all gG is determined by V(e). If we go further, this means that the basis of neighborhoods of e is sufficient to determine the topology of a topological group.

In a metric space, it is not hard to see that the open disc around a point is a basis of neighborhoods of a given point. First, we observe that pnZp form a basis of neighborhoods of 0. Any open set U in Zp is of the form
U=(U1××Um×n>mZ/pnZ)
with 0Ui. Consider xpmZp, then for x=(xn),xn=0 for nm. Then clearly, xUpmZpU. If B(e)={pnZp, then for all VV(e) ,there exists an open set UVpmZpUV for some m shows that B(e) is a basis.

For those who aren't familiar with the term basis, it is the filter base of the neighborhood filter. By the following equivalence
xpmZpvp(x)nvp(x)em
We see that pmZp=Bε(e) where Bε(e) denotes the open disc around e with radius ε. The discreteness of vp shows that pmZp is the only possible open discs around e, thus coincides with the metric basis. We have thus shown that topology induced by the inverse limit is equivalent to the metric topology induced by the metric μ(x,y)=evp(xy).

By basic topology, a compact metric space is complete.

Finally, consider xZp, then there always exists ynZ such that ynxn (mod pn) Then because ynxn is divisible by pn, pn|(ynxn)μ(ynxn)en. Then as n, you see that the limit goes to 0. This implies that x is a limit point of Z which shows denseness.

I have thus understood what Serre's four lines that I mentioned in my second post (of the topology of the p-adic numbers) means. (Sort of)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max-Spec vs Spec

함수와 무한대2