Yoshida - Non-abelian Lubin-Tate 7



  • Now we would like to study the special fiber of X:=A over S:=Spec W. We denote the special fiber by Xs:=X×SSpec ¯k, i.e. the fiber of the special point (the maximal ideal). Sine this is simply just reducing mod π, combining with the result from the previous post where we computed the explicit formula for A, we obtain that

    Xs=Spec ¯k[[˜X1,,˜Xn]]/(a_kn{0}(Pa_ mod π))
  • Let Ya_ to be the closed subscheme of Xs defined by Pa_ mod π=0. Equivalently, this is simply the closed subscheme of X defined by Pa_=0.
  • It can be shown that Ya_=Ya_ if and only if a is a scalar multiple of a by some element in k×. Therefore, we can label the irreducible component of Xs by a_kn{0}. As one can guess, this looks a lot like the projective space over k, so we may establish the following bijection.
  • Let P denote the projective space over ¯k. Then for each a_kn{0}, we can define a k-rational hyperplane
    Ma_:a1X1++anXn=0
    where Xi is the projective coordinate for P. Define YM=Ya_ for M=Ma_. This establishes a bijection between k-rational hyperplanes and the irreducible components of Xs. In particular, there exists qn1q1 many irreducible components.
  • We will identify P as the exceptional divisor of the first blow up.

Blow-ups

Reference: Gortz pg 409 - 411.
  • (Gortz) X be a scheme and Z be a closed subscheme of X. We define the blow-up of X along Z to be a morphism p:XX such that p1(X) is a effective Cartier divisor. p is universal in the following sense: if p:XX is a morphism such that p1(X) is an effective Cartier divisor, then there exists a map f:XX such that p=pf.
    • p1(Z) is called the exceptional divisor of the blow-up. 
    • Denote BlZ(X) to be the blow-up of X along Z and f:XX a morphism of schemes. Then there exists a unique morphism BlZ(f):Blf1(Z)(X)BlZ(X) such that the following diagram commutes.

      Blf1(Z)(X)BlZ(f)BlZ(X)XfX
    • The above diagram becomes Cartesian if f is flat.
  • [Explicit Construction] Let Z correspond to some quasi-coherent  sheaf of ideals I. We denote In to be the nth power of I with I0:=OX. Then consider X=Projn0In. As In is a OX-algebra, we obtain a structure morphism p:XX
    • The exceptional divisor also has an explicit form. It is
      Projn0In/In+1
  • Further assume that I is of finite type. This happens when X is locally Noetherian. Then we have that BlZ(X) is projective over X.

Regular Immersion

Reference: Tag 01AL, Tag 01B1 (Locally generated), Section 30.20-21
  • Let (X,OX) be a ringed space. F be a sheaf of OX-modules. A (global section) sΓ(X,F) induces a map OXF defined by ffs. We say that F is generated by sections (si) if there exists siΓ(X,F) such that
    iIOXF
    is surjective. 
  • The support of F is the set of xX such that Fx0. It is denoted by Supp(F).
  • Let (X,OX) be a ringed space. We say that F, a sheaf of OX-modules, is locally generated by sections if  for every xX, there exists an open neighborhood U of x such that F|U is (globally) generated generated as OU-module.
  • Recall that if R is a ring, then f1,,frR is called a regular sequence if fi is not a zero divisor in R/(f1,,fi1) and R/(f1,,fr)0.
  • Let IOX be a sheaf of ideals. We say that I is regular if for all xSupp(OX/I), there exists an open neighborhood of x, denoted UX and a regular sequence f1,,frOX(U) such that I|U is generated by f1,,fr.
  • Given an immersion f:YX. We don't have a unique corresponding quasi-coherent sheaf as we did for closed immersion. Let Y be a closed subscheme of U for some open subscheme U of X. There exists I a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals corresponding to Y as a closed subscheme of U. If U is another open subscheme of X such that Y is a closed subscheme of, let I the corresponding quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals. Then we have the following
    • I|UU=I|UU,
    • I is regular if and only if I is regular.
  • We say that an immersion YX is regular if the corresponding quasi-coherent sheaf I is regular.

Codimension

Reference: Gortz, pg 128
  • [Irreducible, closed] Let ZX be a closed irreducible subset of X. Then codimension of Z in X is the supremum of the length of chains of irreducible closed subsets Z0Zl=Z.
  • [Closed] Let ZX be a closed set. Then we say that Z has codimension r in X if for all irreducible component of Z has codimension r in X.  
  • [Arbitrary] Let YX be an arbitrary subset. Then we define codimension of Y in X to be the infimum of dim OX,y where infimum runs through yY.
  • (Yoshida) Let YX be a regular immersion of codimension r, then this is equivalent to saying that I is locally generated by a regular sequence of sections of OX of length r.
    • Here why and how do we say that it is "locally generated"?

Commutativity

  • Let f:ZX be a flat morphism. Let YX be a closed subscheme with sheaf of ideals I and X=BlY(X). Then if I=Im(fIOZ) where fI:=f1If1OXOZ and Z:=BlI(Z) with abuse of notation. Then the map ZZ×XX given by universality is an isomorphism.
  • Let ˆXx=SpecˆOX,x, the spectrum of a completion (a completion of strict henselianization) of the local ring of X at x. Let Xx be the blow-up of ˆXx along IOˆXx. Then we have an isomorphism XxˆXx×XX.
    • Need to check how we get a flat morphism f:ˆXxX and why Im(fIOˆXx)=IOˆXx.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Max-Spec vs Spec

함수와 무한대2